
Great Depression Online
Long Beach, CA
December 31, 2010
Inside This Issue You Will Discover…
*** Governed by Morons
*** Your Moral Obligation
*** Profiting from Policy
*** And More
Governed by Morons
Markets are notoriously quiet this week. We won’t
dwell on it…except to say, where money and politics mix along the
banks of the Potomac River, emanates a rancid succession of manic
and unjust raids upon savers.
What we mean is markets are hardly free these days.
They are not guided by an invisible hand, as first elaborated by
Adam Smith. Rather, they are guided by the heavy hand of
government. Thus one cannot consider markets without
considering government policy.
Here we’ll take a moment to recalibrate our scope with a
simple observation…
We are governed by morons.
Nowhere is this more obvious than the economy – where
nearly all the political leaders believe that wealth is created by
borrowing money and spending it…as opposed to saving money and
investing it. Simple logic proves this thinking is false.
Yet the political leaders accept it anyway.
Statisticians call this a Type II Error. Here at the
GDO we call it stupidity. But that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t
profit from it. In fact, when your government employs policies
of inflation to steal your savings you are morally obligated to
protect yourself every way you can.
To further elucidate what government policies are doing to
the economy, how to profit from it, why you shouldn’t drink and
drive tonight, rude noises, and more, we bring you today’s guest
essay – an instant classic – courtesy of our friend David Galland of
Casey Research.
Be forewarned. What you are about to read may anger
you.
Enjoy,
M.N. Gordon
Great Depression Online
---
Profiting from Policy
By David Galland, Managing Director, Casey Research
These days, it’s hard to draw any conclusion other than
that the train is gaining speed on wobbly tracks perched over a
rickety bridge.
Most notably, unemployment has again risen – to 9.8% from
9.6% – very much not the direction things should be headed given the
amount of money the government has pumped into the economy. The
latest data shows that this nation of 310 million souls managed to
add just 39,000 jobs in November. That, unfortunately, falls short
of even keeping up with a population growth of about 1% – doing just
that requires generating a net of about 250,000 jobs a month. As
for eating away at the millions of unemployed and the many millions
more who are underemployed… oh, well.
Of course, the mainstream financial media wastes no time in
pointing to this latest dismalia as proof positive that the Fed’s
recent decision to energetically restoke the money machine with
upwards of $100 billion a month was the right decision. This
despite the clear evidence that adding debt to debt is having no
real effect, except begetting more debt.
This is a lesson that, so far, appears to be making no
headway in the cognitions of Washington’s policy makers, even with
the latest election results delivering a sharp rap across the
knuckles to the power elite.
~~~~~~Revealed~~~~~~
One of America’s Most Trusted Gold Prospectors Reveals…
“How I Boosted My Mom’s IRA by 73.1%”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Evidence of that truth came to me during a recent drive to
do sundry errands. After flipping through the stations, I ended up
listening to a program on National Public Radio with a moderator
quizzing a couple of congresspersons – one still in power and the
other dismissed by voters in the midterm elections.
In conversing with the latter, the reporter asked if the
Democrat congressman’s loss wasn’t a clear sign of voter
frustration. To which the ex-official blathered on about the number
of filibusters threatened by the Republicans over the last couple of
years as a reason why the Obama Congress was unable to get its
business done.
But, interjected the reporter, the Democrat-controlled
Congress passed all manner of legislation – healthcare, financial
reform, environmental bills, etc., etc – so isn’t it more a case of
voters being upset about the quality and scale of the legislation
passed, and not the dearth of it?
Whereupon the ex-Con began to illustrate his point by
spouting off about some wastewater bill that was turned back by the
Republicans, even though it would have unleashed another $15 billion
in federal spending “so important to putting Americans back to
work.”
But wait, again interjected the reporter, wouldn’t many
people listening to this program say to themselves, this guy just
doesn’t get it? That we don’t want the federal government to keep
spending billions of taxpayer money on these make-work projects?
Without missing a beat, the ex-Con flipped like a freshly
landed mackerel and argued against his position of just seconds
before, saying, “This isn’t about the money! It’s about clean water
for all Americans!”
At which point the reporter cleared his throat and ended
the interview.
Next up was an angry Democrat of some influence. The
congresswoman’s anger was directed first at the findings of the
Deficit Reduction Commission that the spending cuts must be
widespread if they are to be sufficient, and then at the
administration for even thinking about extending the Bush tax cuts
for people earning over $250K.
Oh, how I wish I was able to do proper justice to her
diatribe here – I can’t, but I will do my best.
In her world view, the poor huddled masses of America –
being defined as anyone with an income of under $250,000 a year –
had nothing to do with the financial crisis, and so why should they
be held even a little bit responsible for helping to foot the bill?
No, no – it was the greedy fat cats that brought this fresh hell
upon us, and so it is they, and they alone, who should be made to
pay… and pay.
Of course, nowhere in the discussion was there mention of
the role that the many-tentacled government played in all of
this… of the loose money, the looser spending, the wars, the
unbridled enthusiasm for a steady diet of pork, and… and...
If there were some mega-computer capable of fairly
allocating the financial pain based on the contribution each of us
has made to this mess, and then assess taxes accordingly, I suspect
the end result would leave past and present members of the Fed
living in cardboard boxes, and 97% of past and present members of
Congress shuffling in gutters looking for cigarette stubs… at least
when they weren’t fighting over discarded clothes with executives of
the big financial institutions, NGOs, and the Treasury Department.
Having wiped all of those individuals out to the bone, the
burden could then shift to the military-industrial complex that has
so effectively pursued its symbiotic and very, very costly “Don’t
Ask (where the money went), Don’t Tell (the truth)” policy for
decades now.
It could then lay the hooks into anyone who ever took a
government-backed loan – big or small – without first taking the
time to do a serious calculation as to their ability to repay it, or
the unscrupulous lenders who knew that the loans they were
originating were going to end up in default with the tab ultimately
being dropped on the government.
In fact, were such a mega-computer able to do the
calculation, I strongly suggest it would only be after many further
layers that the pain, fairly allocated, would reach the rank and
file business community, the sole real engine of growth in this
economy.
I refer, of course, to the very same individuals so
steadily derided by the vote-seeking politicos, despite the fact
that it is these long-suffering entrepreneurs who wake up every new
day to risk everything in their efforts to create new jobs, despite
the heavy glop of bureaucracy on their backs every step of the way.
Yet it is the few that succeed, against all odds and a
constant battering of taxes and regulations, that this particular
congressperson sees as the villains. In other words, she has pretty
much reversed the proper order of accountability – as one would
expect in a system where all that matters is vote gaining.
When the talk turned to the administration’s apparent
willingness to accept an across-the-board extension of the Bush tax
reductions as part of a compromise to also extend unemployment
benefits (at 42%, the situation of the long-term unemployed is
becoming a serious problem), the congresswoman was almost
apoplectic. In addition to the views just exposed, about the
wealthy needing to pay for their many sins, she was astounded that
anyone could hold up the unemployment extension, given the poor
shape of the economy.
How can anyone argue against the direct benefits to our
struggling economy of putting money in the pockets of people who
most need it, she asked with dismay in her voice. Adding in support
of her view that it should be obvious to all that the recipients of
the money will turn right around and spend it on the necessities and
that will give the economy just the boost it needs.
Hmm, I thought as I drove down the road. All we need to
improve the economy is to give people money.
Why, it’s simplicity itself! And now that I get it, I
think people should just quit their whining about fiscal probity and
all of that, and just let ‘er rip. Don’t stop with small change,
encourage the Treasury to start cranking out checks in princely sums
to everyone!
Thousands, millions, even! In no time at all, America’s
salad days will be back.
Of course I’m being cynical. But the point I’m trying to
make is important, because while I am exaggerating, the economic
concept so ardently championed by the congresswoman is accepted at
face value by most of the government and all of the administration’s
favorite economists.
More than that, because it is accepted, it is policy.
In this construct money is, at best, an abstraction: it has
reached the point that the government, and most people, actually
believe the stuff falls from the proverbial tree. Money is no
longer a medium for saving or transacting with the fruits of one’s
labor, but instead is a commodity – albeit unique in that it has
unlimited supply.
It does not, however, enjoy unlimited demand. For now, the
demand is certainly there. But as the supply increases, individuals
and institutions are correctly wary of the effects of dilution…
debasement… inflation, pick your term.
The alternative forms of money – the sound kind – are
getting a lot of attention because more and more people actually
“get it.” They are beginning to recognize the fictions that the
politicians and bureaucrats believe in and are taking measures to
protect themselves and to profit.
Before moving on, I would mention that I know someone who
works as a manager in the Department of Motor Vehicles. A few days
ago she told me that, other than a relatively brief flurry during
the Cash for Clunkers program, the pace of car registrations has
been slow ever since the crisis began and has shown absolutely no
improvement since that program ended.
In fact, the only increase in the DMV’s workload has come
from the processing of suspended driver’s licenses.
As the latest unemployment figures show and my friend’s
first-hand observations confirm, this economy is not recovering.
And, per the rise in license suspensions, the government is
becoming increasingly aggressive in fine-generating enforcement
actions.
In relationship to the second of those data points, if
you’re going to imbibe this holiday season, don’t drive.
Finally, please don’t misunderstand my comments above as
being insensitive to the plight of the unemployed. I personally
know far too many people in that situation whose prospects of ever
regaining their prior lifestyles is now almost non-existent to be
cavalier about the topic.
The only realistic way I can help – because I can’t and
won’t put my own family’s future at risk by trying to help everyone
– is doing my part to build and maintain a business that, by
offering a tangible value to clients, is able to keep a lot of
people productively employed.
Therefore, it angers me to no end to listen as the morons
maintained in power by the equally moronic masses make rude noises
about the entrepreneurial class and otherwise meddle in matters
about which they have no actual understanding and, as a consequence,
continue doing great damage to the economy.
Something has got to change… and will, before this is over.
Sincerely,
David Galland, Managing Director
Casey Research
P.S. Though you can’t change
the out-of-control spending habits of the government or the currency
debasement they’re causing, what you can do is protect
yourself… with alternative forms of money, “the sound kind,” as
David says. BIG
Discover Cures for the Great Depression
Return from Profiting from Policy to the Great Depression Online.
We Respect Your Privacy
We Will Not Share Your Email
With Anyone Else
How To Protect Your
Wealth And Profit During Financial Disaster